You’ve seen it dozens of times. A project builds for months, cultivates a buzzing Discord, runs Twitter Spaces, drops a whitepaper, then launches, and the token bleeds out within two weeks.

The community goes quiet. The price chart looks like a ski slope. The team blames market conditions.

But here’s the thing: the failure usually started long before the token generation event. The marketing strategy was broken from day one. And the most frustrating part? The warning signs were all there; they just weren’t being tracked.

This piece breaks down exactly why token launch marketing fails before the TGE and, more importantly, what it looks like when it actually works.

Key Takeaways

• Audience mismatch is the silent killer: most teams attract speculators rather than genuine users and don’t realise it until after the TGE, when sell pressure hits.
  
• Vague positioning is a community repellent: if you can’t clearly explain who your token is for and why they need it, your marketing is just generating noise.
  
• Badly designed incentive programs manufacture fake communities: airdrop farmers will complete quests and vanish; real users stay because the product is worth staying for.
  
• Community must exist before the token: the most successful launches had thousands of active, genuine community members before TGE, not just Discord members with muted notifications.
  
• Vanity metrics lie: follower counts and quest completions don’t predict launch success; wallet connections, protocol engagement, and retention rates do.

The TGE Graveyard: What Actually Happens to Most Launches

According to data from various on-chain analytics platforms, a significant portion of tokens lose more than 80% of their launch-day price within the first 90 days. That’s not a market problem. That’s a marketing problem.

The crypto market has matured significantly. The era of launching a token on hype alone, riding FOMO and forum speculation, is gone. As Surgence Labs put it in their Token Marketing Strategy Guide, early ICO cycles rewarded speculation rather than utility, and many of those projects vanished once the buzz cooled. The current market demands something different: visibility, trust, and real adoption, not just attention.

Most teams still haven’t gotten that memo.

They optimise for the launch moment rather than building the infrastructure that keeps a token alive after launch. The result? A short price spike driven by mercenary capital, followed by a cliff.

Mistake 1: Audience Mismatch;  You’re Marketing to the Wrong People

This is the most common and most deadly mistake in token launch marketing, and it’s deceptively easy to fall into.

Here’s how it happens: the team starts marketing. They run Twitter campaigns, engage in crypto Telegram groups, and hop on KOL Twitter Spaces. Metrics look good. Follower counts are growing. Discord is active. The team thinks they’re building momentum.

But look closer at who actually showed up.

It’s not your users. It’s degens looking for their next flip.

There’s a fundamental difference between:

• Speculators — people who buy early, dump at TGE, and move on
• Users — people who actually need what your token unlocks

When your marketing speaks fluent “alpha” and “10x potential,” you attract the first group almost exclusively. And once TGE hits, and the first pump fades, they’re gone, along with your liquidity and your price floor.

The root issue is that most teams don’t define their real audience before they start marketing. They just reach for volume. Who is your token actually for? Protocol users? Governance participants? DeFi liquidity providers? Gaming communities?

If you don’t have a crisp answer to that, your marketing is essentially advertising to a crowd of strangers and hoping the right person happens to show up.

PrimaFelicitas is a well-known name in the market, serving worldwide consumers by delivering projects based on Web 3.0 technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, and Blockchain. Our expert team will serve you by turning your great ideas into innovative solutions.

Book An Appointment

Mistake 2: Unclear Positioning; Nobody Knows What Your Token Does

Test this: go to any mid-size token launch’s Twitter page. Read their bio. Now close your eyes and try to explain what they do in one sentence.

Most of the time, you can’t.

Vague positioning is an epidemic in crypto. Teams get caught up in technical development and treat marketing as something they’ll “figure out later.” Then, two weeks before TGE, they’re scrambling to write a narrative that doesn’t quite fit.

Common positioning failures look like:

• Describing the technology instead of the value (“a Layer 2 ZK rollup optimising throughput”), no one outside the dev community cares how it works; they care about what it does
• Overloading the pitch with buzzwords until it says nothing (“a decentralised, community-governed, AI-powered liquidity aggregator”)
• Targeting every possible user segment and ending up relevant to none

Clear positioning answers three questions, fast:

1. What problem does this token solve?
2. Who has that problem?
3. Why is this solution worth holding long-term?

If your pre-TGE marketing materials can’t answer those questions in under 30 seconds of reading, you’ve already lost a significant portion of your potential community before they even consider joining.

This is especially damaging because positioning is what separates you from the 200 other projects launching this month. Without it, you’re just another ticker.

Mistake 3: Incentive Design That Attracts Farmers, Not Users

Airdrops, points programs, and quest campaigns have become the dominant pre-TGE marketing playbook. And used correctly, they work. Used lazily, they’re the fastest way to build a fake community.

The problem is simple: when incentives are too easy to extract with no real participation required, you attract airdrop farmers; wallets that complete the minimum actions to qualify, dump the tokens at TGE, and disappear. These aren’t users. They’re arbitrageurs.

Signs your incentive program is attracting farmers:

• High quest completion rates but low ongoing protocol engagement
• Sudden wallet activity spikes right before snapshots, then complete silence
• Discord members who go inactive the moment the points season ends
• Hundreds of wallets with near-identical behaviour patterns

Surgence Labs makes a sharp point on this: “The best communities don’t hand out tokens; they reward participation, then convert participants into long-term holders.” Their research into token launch behaviour found that users who work for rewards value them more than those who receive them passively. That’s basic behavioural psychology, and most crypto teams ignore it entirely.

The fix isn’t scrapping incentive programs. It’s designing them so that the actions required to earn rewards are the same actions a genuine user would naturally take. If your quest asks users to actually use your protocol, bridge assets, participate in governance, or contribute to community decisions, you filter out the farmers and keep the people who might actually stick around.

What Actually Works Before TGE

Let’s flip the lens. What separates the launches that hold their price and grow their communities from the ones that crater in two weeks?

Community before the token; always.

The most consistent pattern across successful token launches is that real communities were built before TGE, not after. Surgence Labs observed that launches that succeeded tended to have 5,000+ active community members engaging with content and product well before the token was live. The launches that failed launched into cold Discords full of bots and lurkers.

Building community takes longer. It requires actual product, actual content, and actual conversations; not just hype-farming. But it’s the only foundation that doesn’t collapse at TGE.

Lifecycle-based channel strategy also matters more than most teams realise. Pre-launch efforts should be focused on narrative-building and deep community platforms like Discord and Telegram. At launch, targeted advertising to warm audiences can amplify momentum. Post-launch, educational content, governance participation, and staking rewards sustain and deepen engagement.

Each phase needs a different approach. Running launch-phase tactics during the pre-launch period burns budget and attracts the wrong people. Running pre-launch content post-TGE is too slow. Timing and channel selection need to match the stage you’re actually in.

Build repeatable demand loops, not one-off hype campaigns. As the Surgence Labs guide highlights, speculation without narrative doesn’t convert anymore. What builds sustainable token economies is systems where using the product creates demand for the token, which attracts more users, which deepens the ecosystem. That loop has to be articulated clearly in your pre-TGE marketing, because if buyers don’t understand it, they’ll treat your token like a lottery ticket.

Metrics to Watch Before Your TGE (That Most Teams Ignore)

Here’s a useful diagnostic. Most token launch marketing teams track:

• Twitter followers gained
• Discord member count
• Press mentions
• Total quest completions

These are vanity metrics. They feel good. They don’t predict success.

What actually matters before TGE:

Tools like LunarCrush and Santiment can help you track sentiment. On-chain analytics via Nansen or Dune can show you wallet behaviour and whether your pre-TGE activity is building organic interest or just attracting bots.

The real north star metric before TGE is simple: how many people in your community actually understand what your token does and want it for that reason? If the honest answer is “not many,” you’ve got work to do before launch day.

The Hard Truth About Token Launch Timing

One thing worth naming directly: launching late with a strong community beats launching on time with a hollow one.

Teams feel pressure, from investors, from hype cycles, from competitors shipping, to hit a TGE date even when the marketing foundation isn’t ready. That pressure is real. But a premature launch into an unprimed market is almost impossible to recover from. Token price psychology means that first impressions matter enormously. A launch that opens strong and holds gives you room to build. A launch that dumps immediately puts the team on defensive PR footing indefinitely.

If your pre-TGE audience is still mostly speculators, if your positioning is still fuzzy, and if your incentive programs haven’t been attracting real users, delay is the better business decision, even when it feels costly.

Fix the Foundation Before You Launch

Token launch marketing doesn’t fail at TGE. It fails in the weeks and months before, when teams make decisions that quietly set the ceiling for how their launch can go.

Audit where you are honestly:

• Is your audience made up of future users or future dumpers?
• Can someone explain your positioning in one sentence after reading your website?
• Are your incentives filtering for genuine participants or attracting the farming crowd?

The crypto market rewards projects that build real demand, not artificial hype. Launches that succeed treat marketing as architecture, not decoration: something designed before the walls go up, not painted on after.

If your TGE is coming up and something in this article hits differently than expected, that’s worth paying attention to. The time to fix the foundation is now, before the token is live, not after the chart tells you what went wrong.

FAQs

What is the most common reason token launch marketing fails? 

The most common reason is audience mismatch; teams spend their pre-TGE budget attracting speculators and airdrop farmers rather than genuine protocol users. By the time TGE happens, the community is full of people who have no intention of holding, creating immediate sell pressure that tanks the price and damages long-term credibility.

How early should token launch marketing start before TGE? 

Ideally, 6 to 12 months before TGE. Community building, narrative development, and positioning work take time to compound. Teams that start marketing only a few weeks before launch are essentially launching cold, and cold launches almost always underperform. The projects that hold price post-TGE typically spent months building genuine community interest first.

How do you attract real users instead of airdrop farmers before TGE? 

Design incentive programs so that qualifying actions mirror genuine product usage. If completing a quest requires actually using the protocol, bridging assets, or participating in governance, farmers are less likely to bother. You also want to track the ratio between quest completions and ongoing platform activity; a large gap means your incentives are attracting the wrong crowd.

What metrics should I track before a token generation event? 

Skip vanity metrics like follower count and press mentions. Focus on wallet connections from marketing campaigns, Discord active-user-to-member ratios, community retention week over week, and protocol engagement rates from incentive campaign participants. On-chain tools like Nansen and Dune can also show whether pre-TGE wallet activity is organic or artificially driven.

Why does unclear token positioning hurt TGE performance

Unclear positioning means potential supporters can’t distinguish your project from hundreds of others. When buyers can’t quickly understand what problem your token solves or who it’s for, they either skip it or treat it as a pure speculative play; buying for the pump rather than the utility. This creates a fragile buyer base that evaporates once initial momentum fades. Clear positioning attracts holders, not just traders.